KABUL - As the drawdown of US troops from Afghanistan steps up in 2012, NATO military planners are trying to figure out the logistics of how to ship out the massive quantities of alliance vehicles, weapons and other equipment from the mountainous landlocked country.
The operation requires the removal of $30 billion worth of state-of-the-art military gear by the end of 2014, when US and other coalition troops are to end their combat role, a senior NATO official said Tuesday, reported a private TV channel, quoting an American news agency.
Most of the American equipment will be shipped to military depots in the United States for refurbishment and then redistributed to bases around the country, but some assets will go to bases in Europe, primarily Germany, or in Asian nations such as South Korea.
“The stuff we have here is the very best the US has ever produced,” the NATO official said. “It’s better than anything available (to military units) in the United States.”
He spoke on condition of anonymity because the planning for the equipment pullout is still in its initial stages.
Aside from the armoured vehicles and trucks, other gear that will be shipped out includes large quantities of armour, communications and optical equipment, and large crew-served artillery systems.
In 2011, the US-led coalition began the withdrawal of nearly 140,000 foreign troops serving in Afghanistan, and 10,000 US service members have already pulled out. By the end of this year, another 23,000 Americans are due to depart, along with thousands more allied soldiers, which will reduce the coalition force in Afghanistan to about 90,000.
The quantity of military equipment that was accumulated here by the United States and its allies in 10 years of war is formidable. Although small quantities have already been removed, the planning is complex due to inherent complications of moving so much heavy gear out of a landlocked nation with problematic relations with some of its neighbors, said the official.
Only a relatively small amount of the tens of thousands of vehicles can be flown out by air, due to the massive weight of some, such as the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, or MRAPs, and its all-terrain variety, the M-ATV.
Afghanistan’s neighbour Pakistan has shut down NATO’s main transit routes from the port of Karachi in November in response to a NATO aerial attack on a Pakistani border post that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.
The alliance has been able to ship equipment and supplies in from the north, through Russia and the Central Asian nations. But there is no current agreement allowing the two-way traffic needed to transport it back to Europe via the northern route.
During the recent pullout from Iraq, the US military was able to simply drive its vehicles in large convoys to neighbouring Kuwait where a deep seaport was available. In contrast, the main routes out of Afghanistan require vehicles and containers to be loaded on trucks or trains for the onward journey.
“The challenges of geography are enormous,” the official said. “I wish Afghanistan was a coastal country with a great port, but it’s not.”