Islamabad - Spending too much time online can increase your risk of catching a cold or the flu, scientists have warned.

Those with greater levels of Internet addiction are more likely to succumb to illness, than those who spend fewer hours online.

Researchers at the universities of Swansea and Milan believe the reason lies in the fact people with an internet addiction are more secluded, and as a result have weakened immune systems.

They said the lack of interaction with other people and less time spent outside exposing themselves to germs played a role.

Past studies have also found people who spend more time online experience greater sleep deprivation, have worse eating habits, engage in less exercise and tend to smoke and drink more alcohol.

These behaviours can harm their immune system and increase vulnerability to diseases.

Professor Phil Read, from Swansea University, said, “We found that the impact of the internet on people’s health was independent of a range of other factors, like depression, sleep deprivation, and loneliness, which are associated with high levels of internet use and also with poor health.” Researchers evaluated 500 people aged 18 to 101 years old.

They found that those who reported problems with excessive use of the Internet also suffered more cold and flu symptoms that those who spent less time online.

Around 40 per cent of the sample reported mild or worse levels of Internet addiction-a figure, which did not differ between males and females. People whom greater levels of Internet addiction had around 30 per cent more cold and flu symptoms than those with less problematic Internet usage.

And researchers found people who are addicted to the Internet may suffer from great stress when they are disconnected from the net.

This cycle of stress and relief associated with Internet addiction may lead to alter levels of cortisol, a hormone that impacts on the immune system, Professor Read and his team noted. Professor Read said: ‘It may also be that those who spend a long time alone on the internet experience reduced immune function as a result of simply not having enough contact with others and their germs.’ The team found most people reported using the Internet on average for six hours a day. Meanwhile, a minority admitted to being online for more than 10 hours a day - usually using social media sites.

And researchers noted differences between the way men and women use the Internet.

Women showed a propensity to use social media sites and shop online, while men were more likely than women to use the Internet for gaming and pornography.

Professor Roberto Truzoli from Milan University said: ‘The results on internet usage, apart from being gender stereotypical, were not connected to its impact on immune function.

‘It does not seem to matter what you use it for, if you use it too much, you are more susceptible to illness. ‘However, the mechanisms responsible for you getting ill may differ, depending on how you use the net.’ The findings come after the same team discovered individuals who a problematic use of the Internet becomes more impulsive after being online.

In 2013 the two universities also found that young people who use the Internet for long periods of time can suffer similar withdrawal symptoms to people whom misuse substances.

Skipping Breakfast a Bad Idea for People with Type 2 Diabetes

Running out the door without eating breakfast isn’t a good idea for anyone, but new research suggests that for people with type 2 diabetes, skipping the morning meal may wreak havoc on blood sugar levels for the rest of the day. In a small clinical trial, researchers found that when people with diabetes skipped breakfast, their lunchtime blood sugar levels were 37 percent higher than on a day they ate breakfast. And blood sugar levels were still higher at dinnertime on the day the study volunteers’ skipped breakfast - 27 percent higher, the study said.

“This is of high relevance since skipping breakfast has progressively increased over the past decades in Western society,” said the study’s lead author, Dr Daniela Jakubowicz, a professor of medicine at Tel Aviv University in Israel. What’s more, she said, high blood sugar levels after meals are strongly associated with a rapid decline in beta-cell function.

Beta cells are the cells in the pancreas that produce insulin, a hormone that’s necessary for the body to use the carbohydrates in food as fuel.

High blood sugar peaks are also linked to earlier development of heart disease complications, Jakubowicz added.

Results of the study were published recently in Diabetes Care.

Jakubowicz and her team showed earlier that eating a big breakfast and a light dinner might be beneficial. In a study published in February in Dialectologies, the researchers found that people with type 2 diabetes who ate a big breakfast and a light dinner had blood sugar levels that were 20 percent lower than people who had a small breakfast and big dinner.

In the current study, the researchers recruited 22 people with type 2 diabetes. Their average age was 57 years old. Their body mass index (BMI) was just over 28. BMI is rough estimate of how much body fat a person has, and a BMI of 28 means a person is overweight, but not obese.

Over two days, all of the participants ate the same meal at every meal - milk, tuna, bread and a chocolate breakfast bar, Jakubowicz said. On one day, they ate three meals - breakfast, lunch and dinner. On the second day, they skipped breakfast, but had lunch and dinner.

On the day they ate three meals, the average glucose peak after lunch was 192 milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL). After dinner, it was 215 mg/dL, the study revealed. But on the day of no breakfast, the average glucose peak climbed to 268 mg/dL after lunch and to 298 mg/dL after dinner, the researchers said. (A normal blood sugar level is below 126 mg/dL.)

Jakubowicz said it seems that beta cells “lose their memory” due to the prolonged fast. “Therefore, it takes additional time after lunch for the beta cells to recover, causing small and delayed insulin responses, and resulting in exaggerate elevation of blood glucose levels throughout the day on the no-breakfast day,” she said.

Maudene Nelson, a certified diabetes educator and nutritionist at Columbia University in New York City, also noted that skipping breakfast led to higher levels of glucagons secretion, which raises blood sugar levels. “Once blood sugar levels are high, it’s harder to clean up ‘the mess’ as the day goes on,” explained Nelson, who wasn’t involved with the study.

“In the past, I’ve been somewhat laid back when people tell me they skip breakfast or only have coffee, because we all have our habits,” Nelson said, adding that the findings inspire her to tell patients skipping breakfast is not OK.

Jakubowicz said protein is an important component of any breakfast. She said it aids in “intellectual concentration” and helps you feel full. Nelson said good sources of protein include eggs, yogurt, cottage cheese or beans. She said the tuna offered in the study was also a good source of protein, and she said lean ham, preferably low-sodium, could be an occasional option.

Nelson also recommended adding fruit or a whole grain to breakfast. But most cereals don’t have enough fiber to be a good choice for people with type 2 diabetes, she said.

Jakubowicz’ final advice for people with type II diabetes is simple: “Never skip breakfast.”

She said it’s not clear if the results would be the same in people with type I diabetes, and that she’s planning a trial to see the effects of skipping breakfast in people with type 1 diabetes. She also noted that for women with diabetes in pregnancy (gestational diabetes), skipping meals isn’t healthy for the baby, and could lead to excessive weight gain.