After 22 days of testimony and less than two days of deliberation, a jury found Michael Jacksons personal doctor, Conrad Murray, guilty of involuntary manslaughter on Monday, nearly two and a half years after the singers drug-related death. Prosecutors argued that Murray was grossly negligent in administering an anaesthetic called propofol to help Jackson sleep. A fatal dose of the powerful drug, normally used for surgery, was ruled to be the main cause of the King of Pops death at age 50. (The defence argued that Jackson delivered the fatal dose himself). Here, five takeaways from the highly-publicised trial: 1. Murray came across as 'money-hungry and negligent Dr. Murray, who was paid $150,000 a month to work as Jacksons personal physician, was vilified for veering significantly from acceptable medical practice at nearly every turn, says Jennifer Medina at The New York Times. Hes a primary care physician, not an anaesthesiologist, and thus should not have been administering propofol at all. He also kept no records of administering the drug, did not use proper monitoring equipment, failed to immediately call 911 after discovering the singer unconscious, and didnt alert paramedics on the scene about Jacksons propofol use. 2. The prosecution did a masterful job To legal experts, the guilty verdict came as no surprise, says Richard Hinton at the Los Angeles Times. During the four-week case, prosecutors portrayed Murray as a deceptive and incompetent doctor who abandoned his medical judgment by administering a surgical drug to Jackson in order to help him sleep. The prosecution brought in key witnesses who testified to many egregious medical missteps, which experts said directly led to Jacksons death. The D.A. did a masterful job in prosecuting the case, Deputy District Attorney Dmitry Gorin tells the Los Angeles Times. 3. The trial will tarnish Jacksons legacy For stars of Jacksons stature, says David Robson at the UKs Telegraph, death opens you up to more of the scrutiny that the public feels entitled to. The chilling details presented during the trial become legally certified facts to set against the miasma of rumour and speculation. Each day of the trial brought Jackson closer to the pantheon of real-life tragic figures like Marilyn Monroe and Elvis Presley, who, with the passage of years, increasingly have become more known for how they died rather than their talent in life, says Jere Hester at NBC Connecticut. 4. But America was not obsessively absorbed by this trial The trial spectacle didnt seem to interest the normally voracious consumers of celebrity trash, says Sharon Waxman at The Wrap. It didnt dominate tabloids, drove little traffic to TMZ, was absent from water cooler conversations and late-night monologues, and failed to seize Nancy Graces attention the way the Casey Anthony trial did. That may be because the trial revisited a sordid picture of Michael Jackson we no longer wanted to see, one that was forgotten with the public outpouring of grief following his death. The trials conclusion therefore felt more like a hollow victory than catharsis. 5. Murray may get off easy Hell be sentenced on November 29. Legal experts estimate that Murray could spend less than a year behind bars, benefiting from a new California law meant to reduce prison overcrowding. The minimum sentence is probation, and the maximum is four years in state prison. Plus, low-risk prison inmates are often sent to county jails, which have been releasing inmates early because of lack of space. Id be surprised if a year from today, Conrad Murray was still behind bars, law school professor Stan Goldman tells Reuters. His defence team is also planning to appeal the conviction, says Alan Duke at CNN. -(Opinion of NY Times, LA Times, Telegraph...) The Week