ISLAMABAD - Pakistan Power Resources (PPR) has filed a petition in Supreme Court seeking review of its judgment in Rental Power Plants (RPP) case. The court had declared all the RPP projects illegal and non-transparent last month.The petitioner pointed out in his petition that no advance payment was made or received by the PPR for the Piranghaib Multan project and sought review of the judgment to the extent of the PPR. The petitioner prayed that the NAB should be restrained from taking action, including coercive measures, against the PPR till rectification of the error in the main judgment of RPP case.A two-judge bench of the Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has declared in the judgment that Pakistan Power Resources (PPR) (Piranghaib, Multan) did not generate electricity at all, although a down payment of US $14.58 million was made to it, “which has not been returned”. The review petition was filed through Advocate on Record MS Khatak with a plea that it was a mistake and error apparent on the face of the record that Pirnaghaib Multan plant was made payment of US $14.58 million.PPR pleaded that no advance payment whatsoever was made to or received by the applicant for its Multan project, saying PPR as well as counsel for PEPCO, NPGCL and NEPRA confirmed the fact to the apex court through verbal and written submission in pursuance of the court orders to file a report on the progress of the projects. Besides, it was categorically stated by the NPGCL through its letter of April, 4, 2012 that no advance payment had been made to the PPR (the applicant).The petitioner submitted that following judgment of the apex court in the RPP case, NAB authorities had called the chief executive of the PPR saying they were bound to observe the order to recover US $14.58 million from the petitioner until or unless the Supreme Court corrects its order in the matter.“The review has been filed against rigorous time lines in view of the coercive action of NAB to recover the so-called advance of US $ 14.58 million in the Multan project which was never received by the applicant - the applicant will seek the indulgence of the apex court to file supplementary grounds of review within the statutory period of limitation”, the petitioner maintained.The PPR prayed for interim relief in the instant application saying if the remedy is not granted the applicant will suffer irreparable loss.