According to a news item, (Dr) Babar Awan submitted five points related to reopening of Bhuttos reference in the Supreme Court. Unless I am absolutely wrong, I see no difference between the sentences inscribed under point 1 and point 5. Point 1 states Wasn't Bhutto's trial violation of basic human rights? Point 5 states Wasn't Bhutto's trial in contradiction of basic rights? If by repeating sentences which carry identical meaning, (Dr) Babar Awan wants to play to the political gallery present in the court than he will be romantically successful, but if he plans to impress the legal minds listening to his arguments than he should think twice; because it will fall on deaf ears. DR. GHAYUR AYUB, London, April 21.