Dan Blumenthal

In truth much as I searched, I have found that the Uncertainty Principle of quantum physics actually has no analogue in foreign policy. Regardless, it is a good way to describe Obama’s foreign policy doctrine. Call it the Uncertainty Doctrine.

Businesspeople and economists make a good case that the uncertainty of Obama’s domestic policies has slowed the economic recovery. The private sector does not know when and for what they will next be taxed or regulated, what the new healthcare law visited upon them means for the economy. The anxiety causes a freeze in economic growth.  So too with Obama’s uncertainty foreign policy doctrine. Allies and adversaries have no idea what we will do next and are acting accordingly.

Obama announced a troop surge in Afghanistan and then immediately a pull out date. Should our allies stick with us as we take out just enough bad guys to make the Taliban more vengeful when they return? Or instead should Kabul just make deals with the Taliban? An Iranian nuclear weapon is unacceptable but so is Israel removing one from the hands of Iran. Assad must go, but we will not do anything to make that happen. On the other hand maybe its best if he just stayed - easier to work with than the alternative.

China was a partner in global action problems - perhaps even a G2 was in the offing! Together we would work on climate change, nonproliferation, who knows what else? Now the United States ‘needs’ to pivot to Asia to keep China in check.

Here is another part of the uncertainty doctrine that must leave Europeans and Middle Easterners scratching their heads: The United States is pivoting to Asia (under fiscal constraint) but not abandoning its allies in Europe or the Middle East. The pivot, we tell the Chinese, is not about them. But then Manila and Tokyo ask: “What do you mean the pivot isn’t about China.”

Oh, and we have new battle plan called “Air Sea Battle” that again is not about China. However, it is meant to operate in “anti-access” environments - those in which enemies have many missiles, submarines, and cyber warfare capabilities. Sounds like China. We will be able to operate again in those environments once the plan is executed, but we will not execute it because we are cutting the defense budget, so China should ‘worry’ a bit but not too much. Our allies should have just a little dose of reassurance to go along with their fears.  India whom we would like to join us in checking (or not checking?) China but we are going to leave Afghanistan for India to fight over with its archrival Pakistan.  I think the point is made. Just as uncertainty in economic policy can make an economy sputter, so too has Obama’s uncertainty doctrine made the world a more dangerous place. With no one else to do the chores, the United States must lead with certainty. The rest of the world may complain about our arrogance, but that is better than complaining about utter chaos.                   –Foreign Policy