Germany hints at Libya mission hypocrisy

Are countries involved in the international operation in Libya hypocritical? That, it would seem, is the belief of German Development Minister Dirk Niebel, who criticised participants for continuing to draw oil from Libya. The comments show just how wide the gap between Berlin and its NATO allies has become. First, it was comments from Economics Minister Rainer Bruderle that raised eyebrows. Chancellor Angela Merkels decision to shut down seven of Germanys oldest nuclear reactors in the wake of the Fukushima disaster, he said was mere political calculation ahead of a trio of important state elections. Then, it was the turn of Dirk Niebel - like Bruderle, a member of Merkels junior coalition partners, the Free Democrats (FDP). Appearing on a public television talkshow, Niebel accused the United Nations-backed military alliance currently operating in Libya of hypocrisy. It is notable that exactly those countries which are blithely dropping bombs in Libya are still drawing oil from Libya, he said. Niebel also said that Germany was 'not consulted by France prior to the start of the campaign in Libya and added that European Union foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashtons coordination of the EU position on Libya had been 'suboptimal. Niebels comments came on the heels of a demand by Merkel, made during the European Union summit in Brussels, for a complete oil embargo against Libya. The international community, she said, must clearly show that we will not do business with anyone who wages war against his own people. But the statement by her development minister is one of the clearest indications yet of the gap between Germanys view of operations in North Africa and those of Berlins NATO and European allies. And the implied accusation that oil interests are one motivation behind the Libya mission is not likely to be well received in Western capitals. Merkels government has been widely criticised for abstaining from last Fridays UN Security Council vote which authorised military operations in Libya to protect civilians under attack from forces loyal to Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, head of the FDP, has offered several justifications for the abstention, ranging from concerns that Western operations could likewise harm civilians to worries that the Arab League was not supportive of the offensive. In a contribution for the daily Suddeutsche Zeitung, he wrote about the 'risk of escalation. Niebel said that the German abstention was correct because not all non-military possibilities had been exhausted. He also insisted that the move was not politically motivated, ahead of two important state votes in Germany soon. Westerwelle, however, has been careful not to criticise those countries which have elected to participate in operations in Libya. We understand those who have, out of honourable motives, opted in favour of an international military intervention in Libya, he has said several times in the last week. Westerwelle also said in a post-resolution interview with SPIEGEL that Gaddafi must go, theres no question. Furthermore, Germany has agreed to send AWACS surveillance planes to Afghanistan, along with 300 crew, as a way of freeing up NATO capacity for the operations in Libya. On Friday, German parliament approved the deal by a vote of 407 to 113 with 32 abstentions. Meanwhile, an agreement was reached among NATO member states that the trans-Atlantic alliance would take control of the no-fly zone over Libya. The decision came after days of disagreement, with the US eager to hand over control of the mission to NATO but Turkey and France skeptical of the model. The deal reached would reportedly not preclude France from bombing Libyan military targets independently of NATO. The decision was approved by all 28 NATO governments - including Dirk Niebels Germany. Spiegel Online