In the Court of Muhammad Arif Mujahid, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. M/s Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. Vs Chishti Steel Re-Rolling Industries. Suit for Recovery of Rs. 49,280,523/-. Notice to: Chishti Steel Re-Rolling Industries Noor Road, Siddiqia Colony, Badami Bagh, Lahore, through its Proprietor Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, Proprietor Chishti Steel Re-Rolling Industries, Noor Road, Siddiqia Colony, Badami Bagh, Lahore. Whereas in above-mentioned case it has been proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the above-mentioned defendant cannot be served in the ordinary way. It is therefore, proclaimed under Order 5, Rule 20 CPC that if the said defendant shall not appear personally or through a duly authorized agent or pleader in Court at 08:00 am on 14-11-2017 the proceedings will be taken ex-parte. No arguments of any nature shall be entertained thereafter. Given under my hand and Seal of the Court on 28-10-2017. (CM-16299)

 

In the Court of Mr Muhammad Adil Riaz, Civil Judge, Pasrur. Kashif Ali Vs Mumtaz Hussain, etc. Suit for Permanent Injunction. Notice to: Sarfraz Hussain s/o Ahmad Khan, caste Awan, r/o Saalan Kay, Tehsil Pasrur, District Sialkot. Whereas in the above-mentioned case it has been proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the above-mentioned defendant cannot be served in the ordinary way. It is therefore, proclaimed under Order 5, Rule 20 CPC that if the said defendant will/ shall not appear personally or through a duly authorized agent or pleader in Court at 09:00 am on 04-11-2017 the proceedings will be taken ex-parte. No arguments of any nature shall be entertained thereafter. Given under my hand and Seal of the Court. (Bill)

 

In the Court of Mr Khawar Ali Shah, Judge Family Court, Shujabad, District Multan. Suit for Recovery of Maintenance Allowance and Return of Dowry Articles. Kalsoom Bibi Vs Shahid Iqbal, etc. Notice to: Shahid Iqbal s/o Allah Din, caste Jutt Jakhar, r/o Mauza Nawan Chak, Tehsil Shujabad, District Multan, presently at Near Airport Jeddah, Gaiseem City, Saudi Arabia. Whereas in the above-mentioned case it has been proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the above-mentioned defendant cannot be served in the ordinary way. It is therefore, proclaimed under Order 5, Rule 20 CPC that if the said defendant will/ shall not appear personally or through a duly authorized agent or pleader in Court at 08:00 am on 02-11-2017 the proceedings will be taken ex-parte. No arguments of any nature shall be entertained thereafter. Given under my hand and Seal of the Court. (CM-16294)

 

In the Court of Hassan Abbas Syed, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gujranwala. Civil Appeal No. 77/17. Naik Muhammad through Mukhtar-e-Khas Imran Ali Vs Fateh Bano, etc. Notice to: Abdul Ghafoor s/o Fareed Bakhsh (deceased), through heirs: Muhammad Ilyas, Muhammad Fiaz, sons of Abdul Ghafoor (deceased), caste Rajpoot Golimar, r/o Qilla Sundar Singh, Gujranwala, presently at England, Noor Muhammad s/o Fareed Bakhsh (deceased), through heirs: Muhammad Asif, Jaffar, Muhammad Nasir, sons, Mst Samar, Mst Shaheen, daughters of Noor Muhammad (deceased), Abdul Hameed s/o Fareed Bakhsh (deceased), through heirs: Muhammad Ilyas, Muhammad Fiaz, sons of Abdul Ghafoor (deceased), caste Rajpoot Golimar, r/o Qilla Sundar Singh, Gujranwala, presently at England. Whereas in the above-mentioned case it has been proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the above-mentioned defendants cannot be served in the ordinary way. It is therefore, proclaimed under Order 5, Rule 20 CPC that if the said defendants will/ shall not appear personally or through a duly authorized agent or pleader in Court at 08:00 am on 04-11-2017 the proceedings will be taken ex-parte. No arguments of any nature shall be entertained thereafter. Given under my hand and Seal of the Court. (CM-16294)

 

In the Court of Mr Muhammad Kashif, Additional District Judge, Dera Ghazi Khan. Civil Appeal No. … of 2017. Abdul Ghafoor, etc. Versus Bilal Hussain, etc. Notice to: Kamran s/o Wassan, caste Zaiwal, r/o Block No. 18, Faridabad Colony, Dera Ghazi Khan, presently at Madinat-ul-Sheikh Usman Bandar Gah Addan, Arab Republican of Yemen. Whereas the service of above-mentioned respondent is not going to be effected through ordinary means. So, service of respondent be effected through proclamation in the newspaper. You respondent are directed to appear in the Court in person or through counsel on 02-11-2017 at 9:00 am, failing which ex-parte proceedings shall be initiated against you. – Additional District Judge, Dera Ghazi Khan. (Bill)

 

In the Court of Mr Muhammad Zubair, Judge Family Court, Dera Ghazi Khan. Family Suit No. … of 2017. Rukhsana Bibi Versus Hafiz Amanullah. Suit for Recovery of Maintenance Allowance, etc. Notice to: Hafiz Amanullah s/o Malik Sonhara, caste Burana, r/o Chah Phul Nai Wala, Maua Sakeena, Tehsil and District Dera Ghazi Khan, presently at Sharja National Pain Sanaija No. 2 (Dubai). Whereas the service of above-mentioned defendant is not going to be effected through ordinary means. So, service of defendant be effected through proclamation in the newspaper. You defendant are directed to appear in the Court in person or through counsel on 02-11-2017 at 9:00 am, failing which ex-parte proceedings shall be initiated against you. –Judge Family Court, Dera Ghazi Khan. (Bill)

 

In the Court of Rabia Tareef, Civil Judge 1st Class, Faisalabad. Muhammad Maalik Vs Akhtar Sajjad. Suit for cancellation of documents. Notice to: Akhtar Sajjad s/o Muhammad Maalik r/o Muhammad Nagar, Kartaraywala, Chak No. 223-RB, Post Office Millat Colony, Sumandri Road, Faisalabad. Whereas in above-mentioned case it has been proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the above-mentioned defendant cannot be served in the ordinary way. It is therefore, proclaimed under Order 5, Rule 20 CPC that if the said defendant shall not appear personally or through a duly authorized agent or pleader in Court at 09.00 am on 06-11-2017 the proceedings will be taken ex-parte. No arguments of any nature shall be entertained thereafter. Given under my hand & seal of the Court. (Bill)

 

In the Court of Malik Mushtaq Ahmad Ojla, Judge Banking Court-II, 14-Shamasabad Colony, Multan. Suit No. 259/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Mailsi, through Manager Vs Intizar Ahmad s/o Rehmatullah, caste Rajpoot Chohan, r/o Mauza Norabba, Tehsil Mailsi, District Vehari. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 11,14,505.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 24-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court, this 19th day of October 2017. – Judge Banking Court-II, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Malik Mushtaq Ahmad Ojla, Judge Banking Court-II, 14-Shamasabad Colony, Multan. Suit No. 260/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Mailsi, through Manager Vs (1) M. Ali Haider s/o Mubashir Abbas Rizvi, caste Rizvi, (2) Mst Rifat Naseem d/o M. Asghar Shah w/o Mubashir Abbas Rizvi, caste Rizvi, r/o Mauza Dror Wahin, Tehsil Mailsi, District Vehari. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 9,74,400.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 24-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court, this 19th day of October 2017. – Judge Banking Court-II, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Malik Mushtaq Ahmad Ojla, Judge Banking Court-II, 14-Shamasabad Colony, Multan. Suit No. 261/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Mailsi, through Manager Vs Shoaib Raza s/o Syed Syed Bahar Hussain, caste Syed, r/o Mauza Dror Wahin, Tehsil Mailsi, District Vehari. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 11,21,444.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 24-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court, this 19th day of October 2017. – Judge Banking Court-II, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Malik Mushtaq Ahmad Ojla, Judge Banking Court-II, 14-Shamasabad Colony, Multan. Suit No. 262/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Mailsi, through Manager Vs (1) Zubair Ahmad, (2) Aftab Ahmad, both sons of Allah Ditta, (3) Said Begum w/o Aftab Ahmad, case Chohan, r/o Mauza Kot Kabir Kohna, P.O. Sardarpur Jandair, Tehsil Mailsi, District Vehari. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 9,56,293.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 24-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court, this 19th day of October 2017. – Judge Banking Court-II, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Malik Mushtaq Ahmad Ojla, Judge Banking Court-II, 14-Shamasabad Colony, Multan. Suit No. 263/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Mailsi, through Manager Vs Syed Nighat Bano w/o Kafayat Abbas Rizvi, caste Syed, r/o Mauza Dror Wahin, Tehsil Mailsi, District Vehari. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 9,04,344.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 24-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court, this 19th day of October 2017. – Judge Banking Court-II, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mirza Muhammad Iqbal Bhatti, Judge Banking Court-III, 32-A, Government Employees Housing Society, Opposite Tubewell Workshop, MDA Road, Multan. Suit No. 233/2017. Bank Islami Pakistan Ltd., Bosan Road Branch, Multan Versus Mst Ambreen Fida Hussain d/o Fida Hussain Khan, caste Baloch, r/o Near Allah Wasaya Chowk, Street No. 19, Mohallah Peer Bukhari Colony, Multan. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs. 22,13,854.42 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 13-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court, this 10th day of October 2017. – Judge Banking Court-III, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mirza Muhammad Iqbal Bhatti, Judge Banking Court-III, 32-A, Government Employees Housing Society, Opposite Tubewell Workshop, MDA Road, Multan. Suit No. 264/2017. Bank of Punjab, Branch at Multan Cantt. Versus (1) M/s Ravi Agro Chemicals, Partnership Firm, Head Office: Building No. 33-C, (Portion-A), 15th Commercial Street, Phase-II Extension, DHA, Karachi, Branch Office: CB-45, Garden Town, Multan, through Managing Partner Akhtar Majeed Chaudhary, (2) Akhtar Majeed Chaudhary s/o Ch. Abdul Majeed, (3) Mst Khalida Nasreen w/o Akhtar Majeed Chaudhary, r/o House No. 193, Block-J, Shah Rukn-e-Alam Colony, Phase-II, Multan. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs. 1,23,72,557.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 08-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court, this 3rd day of October 2017. – Judge Banking Court-III, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 182/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Shehar Sultan Vs Ghulam Rasool (Late), through legal heirs: Mst Azeem Mai (widow), Nadeem, Adnan (sons), Zareena Mai, Sabina Mai, Sumera Mai (daughters), caste Daamar, r/o Mauza Daamar Wala, Tehsil Jatoi, and District Muzaffargarh. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 6,89,475.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 02-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 175/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Shehar Sultan Vs Abdul Karim s/o Ahmad Bakhsh, caste Korai, r/o Mauza Beer Bund No. 1, P.O. Shehar Sultan, Tehsil Jatoi, District Muzaffargarh. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 7,18,603.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 27-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 183/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Shehar Sultan Vs (1) Bashir s/o Ghous Bakhsh (Late), through legal heirs: Mst Bakho Mai (widow), Amanullah, Khizar Hayat, Muhammad Shakeel, Anayatullah (sons), Mst Aamir Khatoon, Mst Kaneez Mai, Mast Shahnaz Bibi, (daughters), caste Sindhila, r/o Maulza Billu Sindhila, P.O. Binda Sindhila Ishaq, Tehsil Jatoi, and District Muzaffargarh. CNIC No. 32304-6675369. Cell No. 0301-6986169. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 7,26,513.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 02-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 181/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Shehar Sultan Vs (1) Dain Muhammad (Late), through legal heirs: (1a) Rehmatullah, (1b) Mst Khateeja Bibi (1c), Mst Kalsoom Bibi, caste Punnuhaan, r/o Mauza Shahir Bela, Tehsil Jatoi, District Muzaffargarh. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 9,02,630.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 02-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 307/2017. UBL, Branch at Hussain Agahi, Multan Vs Muhammad Sharif s/o Naik, r/o Khalwal, Tehsil Alipur, District Muzaffargarh. CNIC No. 32301-9826464-9. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 7,94,923.58 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 21-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 315/2017. NBP, Branch at Mumtazabad, Multan Vs (1) Punjab Kitab Ghar, through Ch. Binyamin Sajid s/o Abdul Haq, (2) Ch. Binyamin Sajid s/o Abdul Haq, (3) Abdul Haq s/o Attaullah, (4) Liaquat Ali s/o Abdul Haq, all r/o Chah Gurbux Wala, Mauza Sher Singh, Vehari Road, Tehsil and District Multan. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 9,99,151.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 24-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 176/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Shehar Sultan Vs Abdul Sattar s/o Ali Muhammad, caste Sindhila, r/o Mauza Bhambo Sindhila, P.O. Shehar Sultan, Tehsil Jatoi, District Muzaffargarh. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 6,03,483.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 02-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)

 

In the Court of Mr Shahid Islam, Judge, Banking Court No. 1, Khan Colony, Opposite Abdullah Centre, Near Chungi No. 7, LMQ Road, Multan. Suit No. 162/2017. ZTBL, Branch at Shehar Sultan Vs Bashir Ahmad s/o Sheikh Ganmoon, caste Lungi, r/o Mauza Shakir Bela, P.O. Binda Ishaaq, Tehsil Jatoi, District Muzaffargarh. Proclamation under Section 9(5) Financial Institutions Recovery of Finances Ordinance 46 of 2001. Whereas the aforesaid plaintiff has instituted a suit against you and others for the recovery of Rs 9,23,954.00 along with mark-up/ interest and costs, etc., claimed to be payable by you. Proclamation under Section 9(5) of Ordinance 46 of 2001 to the above is hereby issued requiring you to make within 30 days of this proclamation, an application for leave to defend the suit. Take notice that on your failure to file such application within time specified above, the Banking Court shall pass a decree as prayed for in the plaint. Next date for further proceedings, in the case has been fixed on 27-11-2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the Court. – Judge Banking Court-I, Multan. (CM-15178)