IHC to resume hearing in petitions seeking release of Indian spies today  

ISLAMABAD-The Islamabad High Court (IHC) will Monday (today) resume hearing of the petitions filed by the Indian High Commission for the release of eight Indian nationals convicted by military courts on charges of espionage and terrorism in Pakistan. 
A single bench of IHC comprising Chief Justice of IHC Justice Athar Minallah will conduct hearing of the petitions filed by the Indian High Commission for the release of eight Indian nationals convicted by military courts on charges of espionage and terrorism in Pakistan. Previously, Ministry of Interior submitted a report before the bench and informed it that seven out of eight Indian prisoners, convicted of espionage, were released and sent back to India. 
Additional Attorney General Tariq Khokhar told the court that Pakistan has so far released seven out of eight Indian nationals detained on charges of espionage. He also informed the court that only one Indian national is behind the bars under the Official Secrets Act, 1923. He added that five prisoners were returned to India on October 26 and later two more were released after completion of their prison terms.  
The IHC Chief Justice asked that under which law the prisoners were kept in detention even after the completion of their sentence period. He added that the prisoners who have completed their terms should be released from jail according to the law. The bench ordered the state counsel to satisfy the court over the matter on the next hearing.  In two identical petitions, the Indian High Commission cited Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Interior and Secretary Foreign Affairs as respondents and requested the court to release the Indian prisoners including Birchu, Bang Kumar, Satish Bhag and Sonu Singh as they have served their sentence.  The petition stated that the condemned prisoners were arrested by Pakistani military authorities and were charged under section 59 of the Pakistan Army Act, 1954 and provisions of Official Secret Act, 1923.  It added, “It is the case of petitioners that they have not committed any offence and the entire proceedings initiated from the arrest till culmination in the ultimate conviction are an abuse of process of law but for the purpose of instant writ petition it would be a futile exercise to indulge into the legality of conviction and sentence as by now the condemned prisoners have already exhausted their respective period of sentences awarded by the FGCM.” 
The petitioner’s counsel contended, “The detention of condemned prisoners for the time being at the hands of respondents is nothing but illegal, unjustified and against the law and dictums of superior courts of the country.”
It argued that now no reason of legal grounds exists under which the ex-convicts could be kept behind the bars hence the ex-convicts should be released and repatriated back to their country enabling them to meet their families. 
Therefore, the counsel prayed to the court that it may direct the respondents to arrange the release of the ex-condemned prisoners from the concerned jails and repatriate them to India in the interest of justice, fair play and equity as the said prisoners have already completed their imprisonment awarded to them and there is no lawful reason to keep them behind the bars.

ePaper - Nawaiwaqt