Should Supreme Court intervene if someone’s feelings are hurt, asks Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan

Petitioner says Imran Khan, other PTI leaders, made derogatory statements against judiciary, ECP, Armed Forces.




ISLAMABAD   –   The Supreme Court of Pakistan Thursday directed the petitioner to submit transcripts and relevant ma­terial to prove that Pakistan Teh­reek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders gave state­ments against state institutions.

A two-member bench of the court comprising Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan and Justice Yahya Afridi heard the case filed by Advocate Qosain Faisal. The petitioner had sought the court’s di­rections to stop the PTI’s leaders, including Imran Khan, from giving statements against the institutions. He also pleaded with the court to es­tablish a commission to take further action against the PTI leaders.

During the course of proceedings, Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan asked the ad­vocate Hassan Raza Pasha coun­sel for the petitioner to inform that which of the fundamental rights were violated. He asked which law was violated by PTI leaders. He also questioned why the petition­er did not approach relevant forum to get his grievances redressed. He also asked how the case was a mat­ter of public importance.

Could the court intervene in a mat­ter under Article 184/3 out of public interest against private persons, the judge asked. Justice Ijaz further asked why the court should hear this case.

Advocate Faisal said that PTI chief Imran Khan and other leaders made derogatory statements against the higher judiciary, the Election Com­mission and the Armed Forces. Upon this, Justice Yahya Afridi said that the lawyers’ argument remained un­clear. He asked had the courts been rendered weak following someone’s comments. He said that the apex court had the authority to evoke Ar­ticle 204 in contempt of court. When­ever the court deemed it appropri­ate, it would take notice, he added.

Addressing the counsel, Justice Yahya Afridi maintained that his (petitioner) job was to inform the court and he had done so. He asked the counsel that it was appropriate for him to approach another forum for the proceedings. The counsel said that the petitioner was a Pa­kistani citizen and his sentiments were hurt by the statements made against the institutions.

Upon this, Justice Ijaz asked would the court now take action if some­one’s feelings were hurt. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan said that the statements might had been reported on the me­dia. Only a few were reporting cor­rectly these days, he added.

He said that the court must be made aware of why it should in­tervene in such cases. Subsequent­ly, the counsel sought time to sub­mit reply. Later, hearing of the case was adjourned until the first week of September.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More