ISLAMABAD - A complaint has been filed before the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) against Justice Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, the judge apex court, accusing him of “misconduct” and “amassing illegitimate assets”.
Mian Dawood Advocate Thursday filed the complaint against Justice Naqvi for allegedly violating the code of conduct for judges of the Supreme Court issued under Clause (8) of Article 209 of the Constitution.
In a tweet, Dawood said that the reference was filed in the SJC “on the grounds of misconduct, making illegal assets, and amassing wealth through front men”. According to the reference, the SC judge and his family members were found “involved in malpractices and misuse of power in a criminal-designed pattern during his service”. He (Justice Naqvi) uses his position to facilitate his sons and a daughter studying abroad and getting financial gains from Zahid Rafique (owner of Future Holdings).
Mian Dawood mentioned; “There is a general discussion in the bar rooms that the sons of Justice Naqvi approach aggrieved parties of Lahore High Court and the Supreme Court in criminal cases, demand hefty amounts in lieu of getting facilitation and favourable decisions from LHC and the SC through Justice Naqvi.” “Properties of Justice Mazahar Naqvi in different cities and housing societies are held by a benamidar, who also act as his front men.” The complaint further claimed that the SC judge “openly flaunts his relations with PTI and its leader Imran Khan” and has ‘influenced’ and ‘manipulated’ legal cases, adding that “cases are being fixed” in his court. It stated that he is “guilty of misconduct and incapable of performing his duties as per mandate of law” and “attracts Article 209 for his removal as judge of the Supreme Court”. The reference further stated that the judge “grossly violated” Article 3 and Article 5 of the code of conduct, failing to “be above reproach and for this purpose to keep his conduct in all things official and private, free from impropriety” and employing “the influence of his position to gain undue advantage”.