ISLAMABAD - The Supreme Court of Pakistan will Monday (today) take up the Islamabad High Court Bar Association (IHCBA) petition praying to the apex court to review its decision to demolish lawyers’ chambers and all illegal buildings/structures on the football ground in Sector F-8, Islamabad. 
A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice of Supreme Court Justice Gulzar Ahmed and comprising Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel and Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi will hear the petition filed by the IHCBA and Islamabad District Bar Associations. 
The bar associations have filed the review petition under Article 188 of Constitution read with Order XXVI Rules 1 & 2 of the Supreme Court Rules 1980. 
Earlier, a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed had passed the order in this matter on March 2, 2021. 
A four-member larger bench of the IHC headed by Chief Justice Athar Minallah and comprised Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb on February 16 had also declared that lawyers’ chambers on sports ground in the F-8 sector of the federal capital were “illegally constructed” and directed the relevant authorities to remove them. 
The IHCBA adopted that the orders of the Islamabad High Court and the Supreme Court are based on erroneous assumption of material facts and without adverting to the previous proceedings and order by a larger bench of the august court. 
The SC order dated 02-03-2021 notwithstanding the undertaking of the petitioner’s counsel to vacate the premises within two months could require reconsideration so as to accord with the previous orders of the larger bench of the apex court requiring non-shifting of the lawyers’ chambers till the construction of their chambers. 
They submitted that the Islamabad High Court order dated 16-02-2021 and the apex court order dated 02-03-2021 are per incuriam as the previous proceeding by a six-judge larger bench and its order passed were completely omitted from consideration. 
The categorical undertaking by the federal government, the District Administration and the CDA made before the apex court in 2008/2009 that the PC-1 had been approved and even the money required for construction of lawyers’ chambers had been allocated cannot be thrown onto the members of the bar who cannot be penalised for the fault of the authorities who were bound by solemn commitment made before the apex court.